Marelie Raath vs Ashmitha Easwaramurthi Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 26 Feb at 11:56 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Raath vs A. Easwaramurthi

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

IND
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Raath 1 - 0 Easwaramurthi
They have played 2 sets in total, with Marelie Raath winning 2 and Ashmitha Easwaramurthi winning 0. The last match between Marelie Raath and Ashmitha Easwaramurthi was at the W15 Pretoria, 27-02-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Marelie Raath getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Raath | 1 |
| Easwaramurthi | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) W15 Pretoria(02-27-25)
M. Raath vs A. Easwaramurthi H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 39.13% (9-14) | Career Total W/L | 28.29% (116-294) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Raath vs A. Easwaramurthi Match Preview:
Oh, tennis stats, where thou dost reveal thy secrets! As two warriors, Easwaramurthi and Raath, prepare to clash on the hallowed court, we dive into the swirling numbers that may predict their destiny. Let us set the stage; in the realm of second serves, Easwaramurthi has been able to snatch 35.15% of the points, whereas Raath, with a smirk and a swing, has seized 41.63% over the last half a year. They say correlation to match prediction accuracy is high, and so both second serves brace themselves like peasants quivering before a royal decree.
Return game antics paint a laughable picture. Easwaramurthi, the returner extraordinaire, quaffs up 45.4% of second serve points from opponents, while Raath outshines with 47.22% like some second-rate superhero versus a slightly more excellent super. First serve returns tickle the stats book further: Easwaramurthi's expertise extends to a paltry 27.1% while Raath applies pressure with 34.5%. A true hint to who may go head-to-head giggling away with the victory sash.
In times of distress, Easwaramurthi, wielding a flimsy shield, has thwarted only 52.88% of breakpoints, whereas Raath, channeling ancient tennis magic, has survived 50.62%—perfect fodder for the in-game drama of betting predictions. Sweeping through the last year in review, Raath with their boisterous record claims 57.14% of wins, standing on a noble (W/L 8/6) pedestal, whereas Easwaramurthi, the perpetual underdog, trickles in with a mere 19.23% (W/L 5/21).
When discussing surfaces, Easwaramurthi's best friend is I.hard with a win rate of 46% (W/L 6/7), yet can't stop slipping up on Hard with just 28% (W/L 80/208) like a cartoon character stumbling on a banana peel. Meanwhile, Raath strides confidently across Hard surfaces with an impressive 73% (W/L 8/3), though manage 0% (W/L 0/5) on I.hard, as if allergic to victory on this inner terrain.
Lower-tier tournaments have been Easwaramurthi's bread and butter, winning a minuscule 15.38% (W/L 2/11) in the Futures/Satellites/ITF realm, while Raath, cackling from a higher battlefield, commands a majestic 72.73% (W/L 8/3). Opposition even bows before him, with the average foe ranked at the regal number of 0 compared to Easwaramurthi's more humble adversaries averaging rank 276.88.
In the eve of a nail-biting deciding set, brace for hilarity as Easwaramurthi and Raath have both emerged gloriously unsuccessful with 0% in recent times. Their deciding-set records could not decide less. Capture the tension as break point opportunities arise, for Easwaramurthi has mastered a conversion rate of 25.71%, while Raath, with a calculating eye, claims 36.54% of those anticipated threats to serve.
So who shall claim the ultimate victory, who shall laugh the heartiest in this dance of rackets and resonates of bouncing balls? Based on the whims of numbers and through a haze of laughter, Raath strides forth as the favored conqueror of the court, leaving Easwaramurthi to script an epic underdog tale for another time.
Marelie Raath vs Ashmitha Easwaramurthi Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Raath vs A. Easwaramurthi H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:45:46 | Average Match Time | 1:45:46 |
| 63% (38/60) | 1st Serve % | 71% (45/63) |
| 68% (26/38) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (25/45) |
| 59% (13/22) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (8/18) |
| 80% (4/5) | Break Pts Won % | 20% (1/5) |
| 48% (30/63) | Return Points Win % | 35% (21/60) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Raath Recent Matches Played
A. Easwaramurthi Recent Matches Played

M. Raath vs A. Easwaramurthi Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 39.13% (9/14) | YTD Win/Loss | 28.29% (116/294) |
| 44.00% (22/28) | Sets Win/Loss | 31.09% (272/603) |
| 46.81% (220/250) | Games Win/Loss | 40.28% (2958/4386) |
| 50.00% (9/9) | Hard Win/Loss | 27.54% (84/221) |
| 0% (0/0) | Clay Win/Loss | 27.71% (23/60) |
| 0.00% (0/5) | Indoor Hard W/L | 42.11% (8/11) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 0.05 | Aces Per Game | 0.03 |
| 11 | Aces Total | 116 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 55 | Total Double Faults | 686 |
| 1:9:10 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 394.22 | Average Opponent Rank | 352.12 |
| 58% (575/983) | 1st Serve % | 60% (6315/10470) |
| 54% (311/575) | 1st Serve Win % | 52% (3277/6315) |
| 39% (161/408) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (1590/4155) |
| 47% (46/98) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (463/1083) |
| 42% (390/924) | Return Points Win % | 41% (4296/10569) |
| 0.00% (0/10) | Challenger W/L | 25.00% (26/78) |
| 69.23% (9/4) | Futures W/L | 29.41% (90/216) |
| 39% (9/23) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 28% (113/397) |
| 50% (2/4) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 44% (14/32) |
| 0% (0/4) | Deciding Set Win % | 36% (25/69) |
| 100% (9/9) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (129/104) |
| 0% (9/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (129/25) |
| 0% (14/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 4% (280/10) |